Calls For Legally Binding Quality Standards For WEEE Treatment

The WEEE Forum is calling on the next European Commission to make quality standards for (WEEE) treatment legally binding.

During a dinner event hosted by the WEEE Forum, policymakers, government experts and industry leaders discussed how binding WEEE recycling standards “will level the playing field across the EU for e-waste matters”.

The WEEE Forum President, Jan Vlak, addressed the event and noted that the current situation is that most member states of the EU are not on target to meet the 65% WEEE collection mark.

The WEEE Forum says Illegal practices, such as scavenging, give rise to loss of valuable raw materials and the release of hazardous substances into the environment.

It also says up to two thirds of WEEE is not being reported as properly collected and treated.

The EN 50625 standards for WEEE treatment, a reference for the industry, aims to address those challenges.

Mr Vlak said that, in order to create a truly level playing field in the EU, compliance with EN 50625 should be made mandatory for all WEEE treatment facilities in the EU. Treatment of WEEE outside the EU should take place in conditions that are equivalent to those applicable in the EU.

Mark Demesmaeker, Belgian Member of the European Parliament working on implementing the circular economy in Europe, agreed with Mr Vlak’s statement and added that it is “time for an implementing act towards binding WEEE standards”.

Several member states, such as the Netherlands, Ireland and France, have made the standards legally binding and put the responsibility of compliance in the sector on the whole ecosystem and e-waste value chain.

Those markets now benefit from legally enforced uniformity with equal requirements across the sector, WEEE Forum says.

Read Similar

Frustrations & Uncertainly

Younger Householders More Likely To “Trade In” Than Recycle Electricals

Enva Doubles Plastic Recycling Output Following Investment

FEAD Warns Against Norway’s Scrap Plastics Proposals

What Is A “Joined-Up Approach” To EPR Legislation?

Got something to say about this story?